I presume you mean dotau.org.au...and no, it's always been at www.dotau.org, presumably because it technically doesn't meet the rules for .org.au, and of course, back in 1996, KRE was taking months to process .org.au applications anyway...

jon

----- Original Message -----
From: "Info" <info at cheaperdomains.com.au>
To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns at dotau.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 11:41:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DNS] Should this list continue to exist?

Should that not be dotua.org.au?
Rod

On 26/03/14 11:09 PM, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> Rod
>
> I agree that keeping the archives live is valuable.  I'd prefer to keep them independent of auDA, however.
>
> For those that aren't aware, full list archives (right back to 1996) are here: www.dotau.org
>
> jon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rod Keys" <info at ddns.com.au>
> To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns at dotau.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 11:02:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Should this list continue to exist?
>
> Sean,
> I am talking about the historical records which can be found if you
> Google certain things the old DNS discussion list appears and yes I have
> some old skeletons in the cupboard but I think the history is worth
> keeping for the sake of history of the internet in Australia.
>    I am sure a lot of the pioneers of this industry would join me in
> keeping the archived forums live for the future of the net in .au and if
> you like the generation who will follow.
> I urge Auda to take over the data on behalf of the stakeholders of the
> net in .au
> Kim you have done a wonderful job over the years running the list and I
> for one have had great enjoyment making comments and watching the net
> grow in Australia.
> Archive the list under auda.org.au/history.dnslist.
> Thanks,
> Rod Keys
>
>
>
>
> On 26/03/14 10:19 PM, Sean Finn wrote:
>> Then who would watch the watchers?
>>
>> We're silent now because, I'd assume, there's not too much beef with the
>> job AuDA is performing. If this were ever to change, would AuDA tollerate
>> criticism?
>>
>> -Sean.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Rod Keys <info at ddns.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe Auda could host it for historical reasons?
>>> Rod Keys
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26/03/14 8:20 PM, Rob Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> One note of possible caution - In .UK there was a 'nom-steer' list much
>>>> like this, quite quiet and dormant much of the time but very useful as and
>>>> when it was needed.
>>>>
>>>> Nominet then 'improved' things by closing it and moving to a vbulletin
>>>> system inside their online services, and the reach & debate appears to be
>>>> all but nullified.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26 March 2014 09:11, Sean Finn <sean at wikwok.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    I think it should stay asleep for great justice just in case it needs to
>>>>> get resurrected.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sean.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Tom Minchin <tom.minchin at gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>    Yeah. Pull the pin.
>>>>>> On 26/03/2014 3:04 PM, "Kim Davies" <kim at cynosure.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    For those not familiar with this list's history, it was started in the
>>>>>>> mid-1990s and was the location where the seminal discussion on .AU
>>>>>>> happened. The discussion involved key members of the nascent Internet
>>>>>>> community in Australia, and was the hub of activity that lead to the
>>>>>>> creation of auDA to manage the the .AU space.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today the list if effectively dormant. auDA does not use it to
>>>>>>> disseminate
>>>>>>> or discuss issues relating to .AU, and there are little in the way of
>>>>>>> community discussion here on .AU. For example, auDA saw fit to report
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the AusNOG mailing list about DNSSEC initiatives in .AU, but not here
>>>>>>> (http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2014-March/023181.html)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to pose the question whether this forum should be retired.
>>>>>>> There is certainly no problem sustaining its existence if it continues
>>>>>>> to fulfil a purpose. However, it may be its time has come after 20
>>>>>>> years
>>>>>>> and is no longer a needed part of the community.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd appreciate members' thoughts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---------------
>>>>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---------------
>>>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---------------
>>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/