> I agree with Bruce's proposed policy change on this... though I don't see
> the need for a net.au trial - this just confuses things further... I say
> we just move forward.

I agree.

> 
> My personal view is that no, a new license period should not be
> required as with current "registrant transfers" - it should just be
> a simple update to registrant info.
> 

As long as the new registrant is vetted to make sure they meet the
eligibility requirements.

This brings about the question, who pays for the manpower to manually vet
these changes?

I suggest that domain transfers are possible in this manner, but the
registrants must enter into a new 2 year arrangement, with the licensing fee
going to the registrar for performing the registration / incurring the cost
of vetting.

-Sean.