To paraphrase Vic: "... registrars are required to have a contract with the end registrant which involves the registrant *knowing* they have entered into such a contract with the registrar." Resellers, in the main, act on behalf of the registrant when registering a domain name and this process does not involve the registrant knowingly entering into any contract with the registrar. A registrant can not be legally bound by a contract they have no knowledge of and most definitely have not directly entered into, this has already been established by the fact that resellers have no status with auDA and cannot be legally acting on behalf of a registrant. I have no particular preference for either side of this argument but I am interested in any possible ramifications for my clients, that's what they pay me for, to manage their domain interests. It is quite clear that a significant number of domain registrations currently occurring are done on behalf of a third party without any legal basis for entering into a contract on behalf of the third party. Where does this leave the validity of domain registrations by resellers (or helpful friends) to date? alwynReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC