----- Original Message ----- From: "Deus Ex Machina" <vicc§cia.com.au> > being a serious about being a registrar is not cheap. Enetica has spent > over $.25m on its software alone. the $3000 dollar/year is only a barrier to > entry to small players who will only register a few dozen domains a month. > Here's the rub... if Enetica (or any of the other registrars) would come out and say that they will not go direct to end-user registrants, this time-consuming debate and drama would not need to proceed... and that registrar would pick up heaps of business from a lot of pissed-off resellers looking for someone they can trust. But this has not happened. Instead Enetica have been quiet all thru this raging debate - and we have people like Jon suggesting that resellers should be cut out. If that is a common attitude, then such registrars do not deserve to have a channel through whom they sell. As far as I know, so far, only one registrar has stated they will not deal direct and by-pass their channel. That is Explorer, but they do not to gTLDs. So all you registrars, either you have a channel or you don't. If you don't, then so be it. See you in the market. But, if you do have a channel, then for f**** sake, support your channel - don't cut it out. By-passing the channel is a very short-term game. Building the channel and getting the leverage from wholesaling to hundreds of resellers is a long-term game. I would have thought that is was not only a more honourable approach, but a bigger and better and more profitable game too. Cheers Richard KeevesReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC