RE: [DNS] auDA media release

RE: [DNS] auDA media release

From: Jason Pay <jasonpay§au1.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:28:52 +1000
Can auDA confirm that it is ok to do transfers if the registrant has
aggreed via a T&C aggreement which states that the reseller can transfer
the registrants domain name to a registrar of the resellars choice at any
time without the registrants explicit concent.

I would think that a "signed" aggreement between the resellar and the
registrant defining the reseller as the managment authority for the domain
would be an appropriate measure. Maybe auDA can sanction some sort of
process by which a resellar can have "Managment" authority over registrants
domain names if the registrant aggress at the point of domain regiatration
or after via a eform / fax / or hard copy of authorisation.

Regs,

Jason Pay

>No problems... I consider that the customer giving us Management control
>of the domain is 'opt-in'.
>Thanx for clearing that up.
>
>...Skeeve
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Smith [mailto:smithi&#167;nimnet.asn.au]
Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 6:21 AM
To: Kim Davies
Cc: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] auDA media release


On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Kim Davies wrote:

 > Skeeve Stevens wrote:
 [..]
 > > As we have been given the management role of those to look after
 them, I  > > already consider us to have implicit permission, but I
 thought that they  > > should be informed and given a 'opt out'.  > >
 > > Does auDA see any problems with this?
 >
 > As a "consumer", I have a problem with this. I would rather see you
get
> _explicit_ permission from your customer that you have the right to
> change their registrar (I assume that is what you meant?). Otherwise,

 > your proposal sounds something very easily abused.

Indeed.  As I read the new policy - of which I was blissfully unaware
until Chris posted the advisory about an abuse of it; my fault for not
keeping up I guess - and particularly the ACCC's comments on the draft,
it seems that the protection of the registrant's control over his, her
or its domain licence has won out on this one (applause for AuDA ..)

 > An email with a short opt-out time frame is ripe for abuse. Email is
 an
 > unguaranteed medium, you could be sending the emails to the wrong
 > address etc. It should be opt-in, not opt-out.

If I'm reading the policy right, it is opt-in only by the registrant.

 > In these areas I definately think it is important to side with the
 > consumer awareness rather than open loopholes.

Yes.  I've just forwarded the new policy to one interested registrant.

The ability to transfer without having to renew is worthy too, methinks.

 > kim
 > (speaking for myself as usual)

Cheers, Ian
(having noone else I could even pretend to speak for)


------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on
this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC