At 07:48 AM 5/03/2002, Sasha Sudakov wrote: >Provisionally Accredited Registrars > >"The following organisations have been Provisionally Accredited. > >This means that, subject to successfully completing the Registry/Registrar >Interface Test, > > they will be fully accredited to become operational when the new system >goes live." (auda website http://www.auda.org.au/transition/) > > >Internet Name Group >Namescout Corporation >NetRegistry Pty Ltd >Nexsta Communication Why is ING (nor indeed any of the other provisional registrars) not listed amongst the organisations that have indicated they will voluntarily comply with the Code of Conduct? Perhaps Clause 8 is a problem, for ING at least: "8. Renewal Notices Registrars and resellers shall not send to registrants renewal notices that appear to be (or could be construed as) invoices for payment, unless the registrant is their customer. All solicitations for business should be clearly identified as such, and should include a statement that the registrant is under no obligation to respond and may choose to renew their domain name licence through their existing registrar or reseller." GregReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC