I think I might bid for logistics.com.au I might even be able to resell it to Adrian Stephan. Merry Xmas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Stephan" <akstephan§ozemail.com.au> To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:49 AM Subject: [DNS] auDA Service Level > Hi, > > I am struggling with whether or not it is worth bidding for > logistics.com.au. My thoughts at this time are no. If we cannot find the > commonsense solution of enabling a company to use its own name as a domain > name I really doubt the credibility and integrity of what this is about for > a business. > > Here is how I see it. I am a business consumer looking for an electronic > mail function such that I can correctly identify my company for the life of > the company, which is providing I pay the appropriate registration fees to > ASIC every year. > > At the present time the access to the function is a monopoly run by auDA and > the current level of service they are offering is like a phone company who > will give you a phone number but will not allow you to use your correct name > in the phone book. More to the point, it will allow others to use your name > in the phone book if they pay enough money. Moreover, it might say in a few > years time that you can't use that name. Can you imagine the uproar if > White Pages/Yellow Pages did that? Yet, that is exactly what auDA is doing > and there isn't a whimper. It is so illogical I cannot understand why there > is not an uproar over it. > > What are the options: > > 1. auDA forthwith stop discriminating and restricting trade by refusing some > companies the use of their company name as a domain name, whilst enabling > others to do so. If it isn't commonsense to do that within the .com.au > space, then I am suggesting a category .ivn (Identity Verified Name). To be > in this category your domain name must be identical to the word or words > approved to you by ASIC or State Government. I am suggesting .ivn over .abn > as it is more general and overcomes differences with ABN, ACN, RBN, ARBNs, > etc for each company. Also, this is not some weird license, it is your > name. If I can have www.logistics.ivn.au for as long as my company exists > without any further obstacles, uncertainties, or mind numbing minutia I will > be happy. If someone wanted to have logistics.com.au and providing it > didn't violate any ACCC/ASIC rules I don't care. The .net and .org don't > have the same precondition. From what I have seen .biz is not identity > rigorous enough either. > > 2. If auDA wont/can't do this then the Minister should establish this > forthwith under ASIC and is paid for as part of annual registration fees. > auDA is not involved and should go away and annoy other people and stop > dictating to a company whether or not it can use its lawful name as a domain > name simply because it has a particular position on words. > > 3. If the required service cannot be delivered, the monopoly rights over > this category of service should be taken from them and given to someone else > who will. > > > > Rgds > > Adrian > > > =========================================== > Adrian Stephan (Managing Director) > Logistics Pty Ltd > POB 5068 > PINEWOOD VIC 3149 > Ph: +61 (0)3 9888 2366 Fx: +61 (0)3 9888 2377 > akstephan§ozemail.com.au > adrian.stephan§logistic.com.au > www.logistic.com.au > =========================================== > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the > author, further information at the above URL. (327 subscribers.) >Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC