> From: Andrew Pam <xanni&#167;glasswings.com.au>
> Reply-To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:14:11 +1000
> To: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Cc: "domain-policy&#167;open-rsc.org" <domain-policy§open-rsc.org>,
> "admin&#167;tlda.org" <admin§tlda.org>
> Subject: Re: [DNS] au Domain Administration (Australian Company Number 079 009
> 340)
> Resent-From: dns&#167;auda.org.au
> Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:14:47 +0800
> 
> Are you now going to call for the revocation of all
> domain names that don't meet current policy,

Are you now giving the ok for the redelegation of any
cctlds that don't meet "current policy"?

Such as, oh I dont know, er, maybe one like .au

And if the decisions and processes of .au addressing
should be more widely shared, are you confident that
au Domain Administration Pty Ltd (ACN supplied) really
is more independent and less susceptible to commercial
imperatives than a proven public interest delegate?

[Lucky that we are stuck with .au and don't have to deal
with the dilemmas and dollar temptations of .co and .tv etc]