On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Ron Ipsen wrote: > Not sure I can agree on that one, > > Brisbane.com is not the relevant name for the brisbane city council. > > brisbane.qld.gov.au > > or brisbane.org.au would be more appropriate > True enough but if they decide they *want* a .com name then they now have an precident to follow. Barcelona.com was probably not the appropriate choice for the Barcelona Council either and this is further reason why the ruling was inept. Councils and various "offical body's" are .gov, .org, .edu etc. I would argue that thats were you "expect to find" them .... they are not .com's for * sake. regards doug ----------------------------------------------------------- Doug Robb Clarity Software Pty Ltd http://clarity.com.au GPO Box 763 Phone: 0403 02 2527 Nedlands 6909 Fax: (618) 93867564 Australia email: doug§clarity.com.au -----------------------------------------------------------Received on Wed Feb 07 2001 - 10:26:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC