] In message <199806230949.TAA26231§nico.telstra.net>, Geoff Huston writes: ] >of the administrative preconditions imposed on DAs there will be incidents ] >of scam-based trading practices without doubt. The over compensation risk ] >lies in the proliferation of SLDs, and the consequent devaluation the I think Geoff was thinking of scams by new registrars here. Lincoln Dale raises a point about domain hoarding by (pseudo) customers: ] to my mind, one of the biggest reasons for scam-based-growth within .com/ ] .net is due to the fact that you can get a domain name registered and ] delegated PRIOR to having to depart with $$$ for the service (hoarding). ] this effecively leads to hoarding. (and then domains that expire, and then ] are hoarded again, and then expire, ... ad nauseum). The com.au name policy puts up a significant barrier to hoarders. A com.au DNS name must be based on a recognised (registered) company name or business name. It would be possible for a hoarder to buy a bunch of business name registrations in a state. This has two problems: each business name must be paid for in advance (in Victoria, $70 each), and registering a business name carries certain legal obligations. In Victoria The Business Names Act 1962 requires the owner of a business to: * Commence business under the registered Business Name within 2 months of registration. * Carry on business under the registered Business Name at all times as a name cannot be registered to hold it for future use. (source: http://www.justice.vic.gov.au/DOJsite.nsf/all+by+key/OFTBABusin ess?OpenDocument) What this means is that if someone was hoarding domain names, in order to do so, they would almost certainly have broken a law which has been in existence for 25 years (in Vic), and is presumably well understood and straight-forward within legal circles. Prosecution would presumably be undertaken by the State (so only the domain hoarder should need to pay legal fees), and such new-fangled notions as the DNS and The Internet would not need to be understood by the Court in order to render a verdict. All that would be needed to activate this would be for a concerned citizen to notify the authorities (and if necessary convince them that it is worth them investigating), and the rest of us could sit back and wait for the legal wheels to turn, without having to deal with lawyers, courts or legal fees ourselves. ] for whatever transpires here, I think we should have a general policy to ] attempt to prevent this. We do. It would be very nice to also have the barrier to hoarders of insisting on payment in advance before any domains get delegated (call it a "belt and braces" approach), but unfortunately we seem to have slipped in this over the last year or two. ] what this effectively amounts to is that domain name authorities themselves ] aren't permitted to act, on their own initiative, registering/delegating ] registering/delegating names that they think *might* be useful sometime ] in the future. Hoarding by DNAs isn't something we've had to worry about much in the past but it is a question which will have to be addressed with widespread competition. Maybe DNAs could donate their registration fee to some equivalent of ADNA each time they create a new domain for themselves, to address the financial side. And I think someone should be making sure that they comply with their own policies for domains they allocate to themselves. ] whilst some people have differing views on the current com.au policies on ] what is/isn't allowed, it, as a policy, along with an ethical-allocation ] policy by kre initially, then MelbIT/DNA, has effectively resulted in this. ] i think this is a _good_thing_. and it should remain so. Yes. [ In answer to my own question, hoarding is an issue which must be (re) addressed as part of opening com.au to many registars. ] __________________________________________________________________________ David Keegel <djk§cyber.com.au> URL: http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/ Cybersource P/L: Unix Systems Administration and TCP/IP network managementReceived on Tue Jun 23 1998 - 22:43:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC