In message <199806230949.TAA26231§nico.telstra.net>, Geoff Huston writes: >of the administrative preconditions imposed on DAs there will be incidents >of scam-based trading practices without doubt. The over compensation risk >lies in the proliferation of SLDs, and the consequent devaluation the regardless of whether the outcome is more SLDs / competition within existing SLDs, I think it would be important if we can decide on some general rules for operations within a SLD. to my mind, one of the biggest reasons for scam-based-growth within .com/ .net is due to the fact that you can get a domain name registered and delegated PRIOR to having to depart with $$$ for the service (hoarding). this effecively leads to hoarding. (and then domains that expire, and then are hoarded again, and then expire, ... ad nauseum). for whatever transpires here, I think we should have a general policy to attempt to prevent this. what this effectively amounts to is that domain name authorities themselves aren't permitted to act, on their own initiative, registering/delegating registering/delegating names that they think *might* be useful sometime in the future. this hasn't yet happened in any domains within the AU tree -- nor do i know of it happening elsewhere either -- but we can be sure that someone will try and do it one day. whilst some people have differing views on the current com.au policies on what is/isn't allowed, it, as a policy, along with an ethical-allocation policy by kre initially, then MelbIT/DNA, has effectively resulted in this. i think this is a _good_thing_. and it should remain so. maybe this is already implied in the existing policies, but i don't think it is a bad thing to spell it out either. (i guess its possible to come up with a counter-argument that a domain-name- authority would get themselves a bad name by 'hoarding' brand-name-domains before they're used -- however, i'm sure any large corporation couldn't afford to stand by, on principal, and watch their domain go to some other company, on the off-chance that someone mis-types their domain). cheers, lincoln. (.. looking forward to some informed discussion ..)Received on Tue Jun 23 1998 - 21:12:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC