[DNS] more great auda work, NOT

[DNS] more great auda work, NOT

From: DomainNames.com.au <support§domainnames.com.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:56:44 +1000
it may not be a registrar breach, but the registrant is a commercial 
entity, so i guess it would be a breach by the registrant

sasha

Tony Owen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My 2cents
>
> Unfortunately AUDU insist that you must be able to PROVE a breach, I 
> don't think he can prove it, he can just surmise from the data he has 
> collected.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean K. Finn" 
> <Sean.Finn&#167;ozservers.com.au>
> To: "'.au DNS Discussion List'" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [DNS] more great auda work, NOT
>
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Usually I'm highly critical about things like this, and in the past 
>> have been the first to jump on the AuDA-Bashing bandwagon. I 
>> certainly don't agree with it, but I need to point this out :
>>
>> Auda *sets* the policy.
>> The registrars Register the domain, and *execute policy* decisions.
>> It looks like what you are really trying to say is that you think the 
>> registrar in this case may have exercised poor judgement.
>> If this is what you think, you really have an obligation to ALERT 
>> AuDA to what you consider a breach, and they will investigate it.
>>
>> Dont blame auda automatically for not noticing it, that is not their 
>> job, it's the registrars job to get policy right.
>>
>> AuDA is the Sheriff if needed to be, but you first need to let them 
>> know that you think something's amiss.
>> Read here:
>>
>> http://www.auda.org.au/contact.php
>> #
>> If you would like to lodge a formal complaint about a .au domain 
>> name, please click here.
>> Complaints regarding a domain name may include:
>>    * If you think the registrant is not eligible to hold their domain 
>> name
>>    * If the registrant has offered their domain name for sale 
>> (documentary evidence required)
>>   * Breaches of the domain monetisation or misspellings policies
>> #
>> http://www.auda.org.au/form-complaint-domainname.php
>> Do your duty!
>>
>> Lodge a FORMAL complaint and let them know what's going on, if, in 
>> fact, a registrar is being naughty.
>>
>>
>> SCHEDULE F of Domain Name Eligibility and Allocation Policy Rules for 
>> the Open 2LDs (2008-05)
>> http://www.auda.org.au/policies/auda-2008-05/
>>
>> SCHEDULE F
>>
>> ELIGIBILITY AND ALLOCATION RULES FOR ORG.AU
>>
>> The org.au 2LD is for non-commercial organisations.
>>
>> The following rules are to be read in conjunction with the 
>> Eligibility and Allocation Rules for All Open 2LDs, contained in 
>> Schedule A of this document.
>>
>> 1. To be eligible in the org.au 2LD, registrants must be:
>> a) an association incorporated in any Australian State or Territory; or
>> b) a political party registered with the Australian Electoral 
>> Commission; or
>> c) a trade union or other organisation registered under the Workplace 
>> Relations Act 1996; or
>> d) a sporting or special interest club operating in Australia; or
>> e) a charity operating in Australia, as defined in the registrant's 
>> constitution or other documents of incorporation; or
>> f) a non-profit organisation operating in Australia, as defined in 
>> the registrant's constitution or other documents of incorporation.
>>
>> 2. Domain names in the org.au 2LD must be:
>> a) an exact match, abbreviation or acronym of the registrant's name; or
>> b) otherwise closely and substantially connected to the registrant.
>>
>>
>> If you have already lodged a FORMAL complaint, then:
>>
>> The registrant could possibly argue that they are a Special Interest 
>> Club (CONSUMERS BUYING NETWORK PTY LTD) interested in SEX, perhaps.
>>
>> After your complaint is lodged, AuDA has to liase with the Registrar 
>> and figure out what going on, and determine between themselves and 
>> the registrar that the registrant qualifies for the above eligibility 
>> criteria.
>>
>> If the registrar is unsure, they contact their registrant and 
>> establish yay or nay, and let AuDA know the outcome.
>>
>> If AuDA are satisfied that it meets the eligibility criteria, they 
>> put it to rest. I believe they are under no obligation to justify to 
>> the complainant one way or another what the outcome was, but, I know 
>> that it can take time, several weeks is definitely a reasonable 
>> period to investigate.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Sean.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dns-bounces+sean.finn=ozservers.com.au&#167;dotau.org 
>> [mailto:dns-bounces+sean.finn=ozservers.com.au&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf 
>> Of Michael Purse
>> Sent: Tuesday, 17 June 2008 10:30 AM
>> To: .au DNS Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [DNS] more great auda work, NOT
>>
>> Of course. They don't care.
>>
>> As I've said before, the directors do fine work. The staff do not.
>> They're lazy, rooted into their positions, arrogant, and deliberately
>> ignorant.
>>
>> Hi guys!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:27 AM, DomainNames.com.au
>> <support&#167;domainnames.com.au> wrote:
>>> i thought that .org.au was for non-commercial entities and i have 
>>> notified
>>> auda about this, yet just like the "Australian Style Pty Ltd" issues 
>>> last
>>> month, they choose to ignore it
>>>
>>> Domain Name:             *sex.org.au*
>>> Registrant:              Nic Mason
>>> Registrant ID:           ABN 42322725630
>>> Eligibility Type:        Sole Trader
>>> Eligibility Name:        Nic Mason
>>> Eligibility ID:          ABN 42322725630
>>>
>>> Domain Name:             domainnames.org.au
>>> Registrant:              CONSUMERS BUYING NETWORK PTY LTD
>>> Registrant ID:           ABN 47084374005
>>> Eligibility Type:        Company
>>>
>>> AND THE BEST ONE
>>>
>>> Domain Name:             domain.org.au
>>> Registrant:              AUSTRALIAN STYLE PTY LTD
>>> Registrant ID:           ACN 099892814
>>> Eligibility Type:        Company
>>>
>>> Sasha
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>
>>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.3.0 - Release Date: 6/11/2008 
>> 12:00 AM
>>
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>
Received on Mon Jun 16 2008 - 20:56:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC