No! Don't! To open 1st LD .AU domains is to misunderstand the significant role that we played in the creation of this whole catastrophe in the first place - to misunderstand why the 2LDs were birthed and where they were borne from. And why. We inherited our .AU infrastructure as a result of our involvement in the initial deployment of the Internet. It's not our structure that needs correcting, it's the TLD itself. The whole DNS system was designed around redundancy, and what would survive in a post-apocalyptic context. Commercialising it is akin to breaking out the 4WD Ladas on a snow-laden CSKA Moscow pitch - impressive, but pointless. .AU used to be over-regulated, but now it's very competitive. I can't see any justification for further de-regulation at this time that won't undermine the value of all the domains that the rest of you have been holding onto and profiting from. Many of you are paying premium for the likes of M.I.T. to "manage" your domains. But many of you want to increase your margins. You could lose all of that. Everything. Once .com.au becomes un-regulated as .au - the likes of DNA will pounce, this time legitimised. The .AU part will become almost irrelevant. Sure, the Eneticas and NetRegistries will make their 10% margin, but the consequences... You will damn the market forever. It's all very nice to say that the TLD can buy back a 2LD if necessary - but that's simply not realistic. You're either in or you're out. Once the TLD is in, the 2LD is out. And I'm out too. One policy that we've stuck by, all along, is that com.au has to be registered to a trading entity. That policy has served us well and I see no reason to change it. cb -- P.S. j'vens'cule, vos'toires d'merdeReceived on Thu Jun 28 2007 - 21:22:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC