[DNS] misquotes on auda minutes Re: DCITA review of .au

[DNS] misquotes on auda minutes Re: DCITA review of .au

From: Michael Purse <pursey§gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:45:48 +1000
To be a peak body I think you actually have to do something, Vic.

Not only that, but 20% of your membership appears to have
disassociated itself with your submission.

On 3/13/07, Vic Cinc <vicc&#167;cia.com.au> wrote:
> David Goldstein [goldstein_david&#167;yahoo.com.au] wrote:
> > Stick to the argument Vic, don't resort to the gutter attacking the man. Answer the question. Kim asked a reasonable question and you've not even bothered to attempt to address it.
>
> I think the answer to the question is blindingly self obvious david.  but for your
> pelucidatory benefit:
>
> the industry association was formed to represent the interests
> of registrars of which the overwhelming bulk are members and that is what
> it is doing and will continue to do. membership is open to all .au
> registrars and the association will certainly be making its
> presence felt over the comming months.
>
> the association is certainly the peak industry body representing registrars and
> thus the core of the industry.
>
> if any auda board member has questions regarding the
> association they can feel free to contact me directly.
>
> we would prefer to have a good working relationship with auda, and would
> have thought that its board members where mature enough to deal with
> healthy constructive criticism. but attempting to discredit the association
> by stealth is really not very productive.
>
> I trust that the minutes of the next auda board minutes will contain
> appropriate corrections over the misquotings.
>
> Vic
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>
Received on Tue Mar 13 2007 - 01:45:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC