[DNS] Use of wildcard resource records

[DNS] Use of wildcard resource records

From: James Davis <james§tekscape-its.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 01:58:55 +0900
If you guys recall, several months ago I bought up the issue of the 
wildcards on au.com.au, and com.com.au was causing a lot of issues with 
certain network setups and certain operating systems.

As far as I'm concerned, there is no valid reason at all to open up these 
domain names to the public? What public service are they going to provide? 
The people who have historically registered them, are who? Oh that's right, 
advertising companies and link farms. They provide zero useful content and 
are just a waste of resources. As such.. Why even bother opening them up? 
Sure other tld's offer them, but what are we? Sheep?

Just deny these domains from being registered and be done with it. Avoids 
situations that occurred previously, and avoids the limitations of auda 
saying you can't use wildcards for some domains.

Regards
James

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kim Davies" <kim&#167;cynosure.com.au>
To: "Kirk Fletcher" <kirk&#167;enetica.com.au>
Cc: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: [DNS] Use of wildcard resource records


> Quoting Kirk Fletcher on Sunday December 03, 2006:
> |
> | I think they misunderstood the ICANN article, which refers to wildcard
> | records in TOP LEVEL DOMAINS - ie, it makes a case against
> | registries using wildcards for non existant or unregistered domains....
> | what individuals do with their own domains is not any of their business
> | - indeed, many services rely on a wildcard DNS entry for subdomains.
> |
> | auDA's statement, "auDA notes that the use of wildcard resource
> | records is widely regarded within the internet technology community
> | as detrimental to the operational stability of the DNS," is simply not
> | correct in this context.  Again, I think they misunderstood the ICANN
> | report as referring to use of wildcards in all levels (ie, subdomains).
> |
> | Of course, it seems they are referring specifically to TLD.com.au
> | domains (eg, com.com.au), but I think they need to make it a bit
> | clearer - as it stands, the final sentence is disturbing:
> |
> | "In the meantime, registrants who use wildcard resource records
> | should be aware that auDA will take action to protect the operational
> | stability and utility of the .au DNS."
>
> There are technical issues associated with having wildcards like
> "*.de.com.au" that would affect the correct operation of ".de" domains.
> For example, one ccTLD registry reports getting 14,000 misdirected
> queries a minute due to this problem.
>
> I don't know if this is what auDA is targetting, but it is not correct
> to say wildcards only impact at the second level (which I assume you
> mean, as opposed to a wildcard at the top level would be "*.")
>
> There is currently an ICANN RSTEP process evaluating this specific
> technical issue and will deliver its report in the next few days.
>
> kim
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> 
Received on Sun Dec 03 2006 - 16:58:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:09 UTC