>If you were still maintaining a license with KRE for your .com.au domain
today,
>it wouldn't do you much good.

Sure, but is there even a single example of a domain name registered during
KRE's time being taken away from the current registrant based on revised
rules?


>-- Original Message --
>Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:22:42 +0000
>From: Kim Davies <kim&#167;cynosure.com.au>
>To: Jon Lawrence <jon&#167;jonlawrence.com>
>Cc: "'.au DNS Discussion List'" <dns&#167;dotau.org>,
>        "'Charlie McCormack'" <charlie&#167;mccormack.net.au>
>Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
>Reply-To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
>
>
>Quoting Jon Lawrence on Tuesday July 18, 2006:
>| 
>| I think it's also worth remembering that although you may only have a
>| licence to hold a domain name, as long as you continue to remain eligible
>to
>| hold that licence, and continue to remember to renew it, it is in effect
>| yours, in perpetuity.
>
>Of course, these elements are the key differences that are important
>to consider. When you own something you have a reasonable belief it is
>yours in perpetuity, whereas with a domain it is incumbent that you
>continue to maintain eligibility, follow domain policy and so forth.
>
>It is probably worth noting it also relies on the assumption the
>licensor maintains the authority to provide you with the license. If you
>were still maintaining a license with KRE for your .com.au domain today,
>it wouldn't do you much good.
>
>kim
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/