On 10/13/05, Vic Cinc <vicc&#167;cia.com.au> wrote:
>
> Dassa [dassa&#167;dhs.org] wrote:
> >
> > You may call it warehousing, others have called it good commercial
> sense, a
> > lot of us see it as cybersquatting. If there isn't an intention to use
> the
> > name but only to sell it off to the highest bidder it is cybersquatting
> pure
> > and simple.
>
> there is no intention to sell the name. there is no cybersquating. there
> is no passing off. the registrations are all in good faith.
>
> I am 100% confident based on the principle of similarly allowed claims
> that the claims are 100% valid under the current rules and in fact any
> reasonable eligibility rule you can think of.
>
> we have knocked back cybersquaters and other scammers before, if I
> thought this was a scam we would not have accepted the registrations.
>
> and seriously I have knocked back some rather large offers in the past.
>
> the value of Enetica's reputation is worth much more to us then that.
> Enetica has an excellent reputation in the marketplace and we want to
> keep it that way.
>
> there is really little point speculating about the claims
> because we value our customers privacy and even if wasnt inappropriate
> privacy laws specifically prohibit me from doing so.
>
> as I said nothing to see here, move along.
>
> Vic
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20051018/7b3fb456/attachment.htm