Dassa [dassa§dhs.org] wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ thats not an au is it! gee I am so surprised given the .au holds real "value". obviously not enough value for you to use it. what the fsck use is "value" when you cant access it??????? > > Where is the public good in opening up the .au namespace so that Registrars > can sell more domains in it? where is the public bad by opening it up? the public good is self obvious a greater democratisation of the name space. you seem to be part of the ambient socialism in this country that is always looking for an opportunity to turn it into an overregulated shithole. no respect for privacy and no appreciation or understanding of liberty or freedom. VicReceived on Sat Sep 24 2005 - 21:48:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC