Hahahahahahahah

Skeeve, normally I'd agree with you , but on this issue in general, no way
dude.
It's obvious what registrars want! TO MAKE MONEY OF COURSE!

How? 

SELL MORE DOMAINS!

Of course, if business that aren't yet in existence can't get a decent
domain name to trade under, then that's a good thing! ISNT IT! BECAUSE WE'RE
LINING THE 10 or 15 Registrar's pockets with money, and screw everyone else.

YEAH BABY, OF COURSE, AS A CONSUMER, I WANT SOMEONE TO CAMP ON A DOMAIN NAME
AND SELL IT BACK TO ME AT AN ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED PRICE!



Get a grip.

ANYONE

Absolutely ANYONE on this list that wants this is trying to line their own
pockets with gold, or is a complete twit. 

Normally that's not a bad thing, but for crying out loud, at least add some
value to the product!

It only equates to Spawn Camping.

Theres a handful of people on this list that have now lost my respect
because of their attitude to spawn camping.

.AU is perfect as it is, leave it the F*** alone.

Consumers have a reasonable chance of getting the domains they want,

Prices aren't too bad, and are still on the way down,

And theres hardly any B.S. about people chewing up a non-renewable resource.


IF ANYONE AT ALL HAS A GOOD REASON to allow people to spawn camp on a
domain, now's the time to speak up. HOW EXACTLY does it add value apart from
initially selling more domains? 

How does this benefit the users of .au., not the providers of .au ?

-Sean.

I'm willing to discuss this on or off list.

AUDA, Ignore these bloody twits, don't allow spawn camping!




> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-bounces+sean.finn=ozservers.com.au§dotau.org [mailto:dns-
> bounces+sean.finn=ozservers.com.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Time for the rules to change
> regardingtransferringdomainname licences
> 
> 
> No.  It just means they have a hell of a lot more experience than even you
> or auDA about what consumers want.
> You can ignore their opinions like a typical monopoly with their head up
> their ass, or actually listen to them.
> 
> Why doesn't auDA be mature and get all the Registrars in a room and ask
> them
> what they think and listen to their collective experience.... Or don't you
> think you will like what you hear, because it is quite obviously a
> collective opinion.
> 
> ...Skeeve
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________
> Skeeve Stevens, RHCE     Email: skeeve§skeeve.org
> Si vis pacem, para bellum
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-bounces+skeeve=skeeve.org§dotau.org
> [mailto:dns-bounces+skeeve=skeeve.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Kim Davies
> Sent: Saturday, 24 September 2005 12:09 AM
> To: Deus Ex Machina
> Cc: .au DNS Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Time for the rules to change regarding
> transferringdomainname licences
> 
> Quoting Deus Ex Machina on Friday September 23, 2005:
> |
> | you are free to express your opinion but please dont talk about public
> | interest as though you have any real exposure to it.
> | since betwen me and bruce represent about half the name space I think
> | we have a far clearer idea of what the public interest is.
> 
> I'm afraid being a registrar doesn't give you a monopoly on being correct.
> The implication that registrars have the unassailable high ground and
> other
> people are not in a position to have any expertise is laughable.
> 
> kim
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> 
> ========================================================================
>  iBurst Wireless Broadband from $34.95/month   www.platformnetworks.net
>  Forward undetected SPAM to:                   spam§mailsecurity.net.au
> ========================================================================
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/