Bruce I agree that it is time to review this policy. Small Enterprise Telecommunications Centre (SETEL) <www.setel.com.au> recommended to the auDA Board in August 2003 <www.setel.com.au/publications/public/policy/001a.htm> that: - it remove the prohibition on transfers of com.au domain name licences between registrants; - ensure that there are no auDA regulatory impediments to transfers of com.au domain name licences between registrants; and - encourage, or at least not discourage, the development of an orderly, open and competitive secondary market in .com.au domain name licences. Arguments in support of these recommendations were advanced in a SETEL Paper sent to the Chairman of auDA in July 2003: SETEL Public Policy Paper: No 1, 19 July 2002 Subject: Transfers of domain name licences between Registrants Submission to: Board of au Domain Administration Limited (auDA) <www.setel.com.au/publications/public/policy/001.htm> (NOTE: The links in this Paper are broken.) Ian Johnston Policy Consultant SETEL 0413 990 112 > -----Original Message----- > From: dns-bounces+ian.johnston=infobrokers.com.au§dotau.org > [mailto:dns-bounces+ian.johnston=infobrokers.com.au§dotau.org]On Behalf > Of Bruce Tonkin > Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2005 2:43 PM > To: .au DNS Discussion List > Subject: [DNS] Time for the rules to change regarding transferring > domainname licences > > > Hello Vic, > > > > > isnt it time we ended this farce and let people do what they > > want with the names they own? if you can sell car licence > > plates or phone numbers why cant you sell domain names. > > I agree. You could also add fishing licences, taxi licences etc to the > list above. > > It is time to review this policy. > > I see no reason why a domain name licence cannot be transferred to > another party. > > I think the domain name registrar should review the eligibility of the > new licence holder before completing the change of ownership. > > I see no difference between: > > Register domain name licence to party A after eligibility check > Party A cancels domain name licence > Register domain name licence to party B after eligibility check > > And > > Register domain name licence to Party A > Party A requests a transfer of licence to Party B > Registrar completes licence transfer to Party B, after eligibility check > > If we want to be extra careful, you may require the registry to publish > a list of pending licence transfers, and allow the intellectual property > lawyers to monitor the list and raise objections under some sort of UDRP > process. Another protection against various forms of fraud/hijacking > etc would be to put some time limits on when a transfer can occur (e.g > at least 60 days past initial registration, and 60 days past the last > registrant transfer). > > The policy framework developed to protect registrants in transfers of > registrar could be used for transfers of registrant. > > With respect to generic names which were auctioned sometime ago - I see > no rason why a current licence holder should not be allowed to transfer > their licence. > > Regards, > Bruce Tonkin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ >Received on Fri Sep 23 2005 - 05:59:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC