Maybe this should be reported to the ACCC as well.

 

  _____  

From: dns-bounces+ryant=arach.net.au§dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+ryant=arach.net.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of bw
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:32 AM
To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

 

So far he is the only one that's been found to do this, how many others did?


 

Whoever drew up the rules either didn't foresee this happening or it is
allowed. 

 

Still waiting on the auDA to say something. or are they still partying?

 

bw

 

 

 

  _____  

From: dns-bounces+bw=efe.com.au§dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+bw=efe.com.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:19 AM
To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

 

I had many clients wanting these name and spending $2000 is pocket change
compared to what the names are worth, Bottom line is the system FAILED and
should be reviewed ASAP..

 

  _____  

From: dns-bounces+ryant=arach.net.au§dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+ryant=arach.net.au§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:35 AM
To: .au DNS Discussion List
Subject: Re: [DNS] Australia's luckiest man?

 

He's paid out $1000 to register the company and he's paid out about a $1000
for the release fee that's $2000. How many would have paid that figure to 
abide by the rules! Not many I would think. Do the maths on that one!


I'm sorry but I don't understand your point.  Are you saying that we
shouldn't expect someone that spends that sort of money to abide by the
rules?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20050831/4277f83c/attachment.htm