Politic persuasions aside, it is critical for the longevity of the Australian Internet that the Labor Party does not legislate to take control of the regulation of .au domain names (this could be achieved from the opposition, though is very unlikely). The article below is part of Labor's opposition to this industry's self regulation. The horse has bolted on the release of geographic names. However if stkilda.com.au (or similar) ends up resolving to an Adult site, this will be 'evidence' needed to say that the industry is unable to self regulate. The fact that domain names are provided a 2 year licence (which I agree with, though is a separate debate), could provide the current Government or a future Government, the impetus to legislate so that upon expiry names are placed on a reserved list or handled in another way. Whether you agree with this or not, if this happens in the future, we are going to have widespread problems as domain names can become the basis of a brand that trades in eCommerce. Consider the impact of removal of this name in x years time. Not attempting to be an alarmist. I have a strong belief that this industry should retain self regulation (and the policies that it imposes), as the Internet needs flexibility to change policy and respond to market forces. If legislated, I fear that flexibility, efficiency and to a certain extend, innovation, will be hampered. The only action that is currently required is the reinforcement of auda as the Australian authority. This can be achieved through its financial stability, a solid Board and good management. I believe that the industry as a whole needs to take increased ownership and membership of auda. Simply, I advocate self regulation and hope that the Government of the day allows self determination. Cheers Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kim Davies [mailto:kim§cynosure.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 9:05 PM To: dns§dotau.org Subject: [DNS] Geographics raise Labor eyebrows Apparently the Labor Party has criticised the government for not taking control of .au policy <http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200505/s1381112.htm>: The Labor Party says federal government plans to allow the sell-off of the names of every country town, district and regional centre in Australia as Internet domain names could see towns' names used for inappropriate websites. From tomorrow, Australian businesses will be able to apply to register commercial geographic names, like stkilda.com.au or bondi.net.au, which have previously been restricted. Shadow Agriculture Minister Gavan O'Connor says allowing the sell-off will cause enormous problems. "Every country town and rural district or regional centre that prides itself in its name, and identifies with its name, could have it flogged off to a business that's prepared to pay a high price for access to that domain name," he said. "We were instructed to go to the Las Vegas website and, of course, what came up on the screen was a brothel." But Prime Minister John Howard says the Federal Government is not responsible for the sale of Internet domain names for Australian towns and districts. Mr Howard has told Parliament a working group with members from state and territory governments, the Local Government Association and Internet representatives have developed the policy. Mr Howard says the first stage will give appropriate businesses the chance to lease the name for two years. "Importantly, the proceeds flowing from this will allow the second stage of this process, which will be reserved for community groups, that's sporting clubs, charities, local churches etc to allow them to establish an online presence for their towns and localities," he said. [snip] kim --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC