hi

I think you need to step back and think anytime
you have a policy which requires a subjective decision
you are going to get different people with different opinions
about the meaning. 

we wish auda was driven by registrars :) if you ever attend
an auda/registrar meeting you could see that it is simply not the case.

our aim is to try and give customers what they want
within the context of the policies and provide the best possible
service we can.

Vic


Bill [ansearchwatch§yahoo.co.uk] wrote:
> Kim
> 
> > It would be nice to get some hard data on things
> > like number of
> > complaints, how they are handled, methods of
> > resolution etc. to make
> > an informed evaluation of the current system.
> > Something like a case
> > database, as you can do with UDRP requests, would
> > provide relevant
> > history to both determine the future course of
> > policy, and find relevant
> > precedent on how policy is being interpreted.
> 
> I agree some degree of transparency would indeed be
> helpful. From my point of view it seems that auda is
> driven by the registrars, who's main objective is to
> sell as many domains as possible. It seems even they
> are not sure how to interpret policy which generally
> means leaning towards a sale. 
> 
> > I would say throwing out unqualified remarks like
> > that only serves to undermine whatever you're
> saying.
> 
> Yes I apologise
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the 
> author, further information at the above URL.
>