Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Deus Ex Machina <vicc§cia.com.au>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:44:51 +1100

ian&#167;bluedoor [auda206§bluedoor.com.au] wrote:
> It depends who your customers are ?
> 
> I thought the policy was there to protect the consumer.

from having names they want?

Vic

Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Previous message: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
In reply to: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Next in thread: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Reply: ian§bluedoor: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"
Reply: Kim Davies: "Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC