On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Ron Stark wrote:

 > Chesley hath protested that his latest mailout contained some inadvertent
 > errors allegedly introduced by his mailing company.
 >  
 > Unfortunately this does not pass the "smell" test.

Fortunately, Ches, Brad and crew have done us valuable service in finely
honing our e-senses over the years.

 > Some of my .com.au clients received solicitations to buy their corresponding
 > .com name.  Leaving aside Chesley's exorbitant price of $225, the question
 > that should be asked is how Chesley has harvested the .com.au names in order
 > to even find the corresponding .com name.  Given the wording on his mailout,
 > without harvesting it would unlikely have been possible.

The fact that he's free to keep pulling the same old scams again and
again says heaps about the effectiveness of the wristslappings to date.

 > As regards the drug charges laid against Chesley, I suggest that we play the
 > ball, not the man, despite what we may think of him as a person.

Yeah, some of my best friends ..

Cheers, Ian