I don't think there is a conspiracy theory here. Call auDA and ask the question. They follow the rules like everybody else. If they are outside of that they will explain. Don't pre-judge the situation without the facts Based upon what you have said, I suggest you have a good claim to it. Again, that is up to auDA to explain Cheers -----Original Message----- From: magic2147§optushome.com.au [mailto:magic2147§optushome.com.au] Sent: Friday, 13 August 2004 1:56 PM To: dns§dotau.org Subject: Re: [DNS] Advice on registration of recent .net.au On 13 Aug 2004 at 11:13, Craig Oehlers wrote: > Recently I registered chaos.net.au which was freely available for registration. This domain name was one of the many .net.au drops which had a 30 day pending delete period (more than the standard 14 days) and I have today received notification from auDA that the previous registrant remained entitled to the registration of the domain name. Please note that a domain name in pending delete status would have been inactive giving the previous registrant substantial notice and opportunity to renew the domain. > > Please go to http://chaos.net.au/audaletter.pdf to view the letter received from auDA. > > Can anyone shed some light on the matter? Or has anyone had any similar experiences? > > Craig > As the song says: "Better get a lawyer son. Getcha ya self a good one." This seems to be totally unconscionable conduct on the part of some one and very shabby treatment of yourself. No doubt some mate is getting looked after. cb --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC