Hi Anand, I should have provided a clearer explanation. :) Bind running in delegation-only mode will not resolve addresses where the name servers for the domain in question are (ultimately) all in another TLD and where the prime TLD registry does not support glue for nameservers in another TLD. In my example afgonline.com.au nameservers are in .au (rescuegroup.com.au), but the nameservers for rescuegroup.com.au are in .com (rescuegroup.com) and resolution fails at that point - no glue. To ensure reliablility under the world according to delegation-only you need at least one nameserver completely within the same TLD or you become invisible to people who disagree with Verisign. This is not specific to .au and is not finger pointing, simply an observation. alwyn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anand Kumria" <wildfire§progsoc.uts.edu.au> To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: Re: [DNS] BIND Delegation Only Hi Alwyn, I'm coming a bit late here and it would seem you've since resolved your problem. However I'm not sure I understand what the original problem was, could you elaborate futher? On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:55:55PM +1000, Alwyn Smith wrote: > This one had me going for a while because the problem was further up the dns > chain than I was looking. Hopefully this info may help someone else with > "inexplicable" dns failures on .au domains. > > afgonline.com.au would not resolve: > > afgonline.com.au. 2554 IN NS ns1.rescuegroup.com.au. > afgonline.com.au. 2554 IN NS ns2.rescuegroup.com.au. so, dig ns1.recusgroup.com.au and dig ns1.recusgroup.com.au would both fail? > > ns1.rescuegroup.com.au. 2554 IN A 203.103.84.232 > ns2.rescuegroup.com.au. 2554 IN A 210.11.148.5 Were these glue records for ausregistry.net or were they listed as NS in the zone file? > > rescuegroup.com.au. 2477 IN NS ns1.rescuegroup.com. > rescuegroup.com.au. 2477 IN NS ns2.rescuegroup.com. Same question as above. > > If you operate bind in "delegation only" mode then lookups of .au domains > with name servers _ultimately_ in "delegation only" domains will fail. So this is a client problem (i.e. the admin of a zone has setup delegation only) and there isn't much that a third party zone operator can do about things? Not sure I fully understand, and insight would be appreciated. Regards, Anand -- `` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think. When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC