What I'd like to know is where has josh found the email addresses? I've looked on the auDA site and have only found a list of names/organisations - not individuals email addresses? Where did you get the email addresses Josh? Regards, Jason Pay Josh Rowe <josh§email.nu> 13/11/2003 07:10 AM Please respond to dns To: dns§lists.auda.org.au cc: Subject: Re: [DNS] Re: auDA AGM 2003 Ron, Thanks for your pragmatic view of things. The reason why I haven't sought your vote is because you're in Supply class and cannot vote for me as a Demand class candidate. Option (3) is pretty much what I did with the aid of the public auDA member list (http://www.auda.org.au/about/members-list.html), my personal email contact list and Google. There are also a number of Demand class members who I have spoken to face-to-face and on the telephone. Which leaves a small number of Demand class members who I cannot find any contact details for at all (eg Warner Village Theme Parks). Josh -- http://josh.id.au/ On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:48:28PM +1100, Ron Stark wrote: > Let me address the issue of Josh's email from a different perspective. > In order to solicit votes, Josh needed to present his credentials and > position to all members who are entitled to vote. He has some options: > > 1 To make a public statement on this list, in which case he'd reach > only part of his constituency > 2 To mail each member individually, in which case he'd need access to > all auda's private list of members, which I suspect would be improper. > 3 To mail those members who are on his personal mail list, in an effort > to be discreet > 4 To do all of the above, which means that several members would have > received multiple solicitations from Josh. > > Because I never received such an email from Josh, I must asume that he > mailed only members in his personal list, which to me is wholly > appropriate, is not spam, and is a proper approach. Would there have > been howls of protest had he made such a solicitation in this forum? > Perhaps, but then again perhaps not. > > To have loudly protested here is, I think, petty, maybe even malicious. > A mature response would have been to object to Josh personally, as was > his original mail. > > Ron Stark --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC