At 12:36 +1000 22/7/03, jamesguy wrote: >How can these anomalies be accounted for? The only answer is that >this information came from the register and unless someone has been >really really really really really busy the question begs? For someone who is a vocal advocate of freely-available information, you sure are kicking up one hell of a stink about a little bit of relevant information published about your own nefarious activities. ...R.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC