The address is:

Domain Names Australia
Reply Paid 1688
Melbourne, Vic 8060



-----Original Message-----
From: John Thomson [mailto:john§hep10.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:42 PM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] .net.au Regsitration Offer


Please tell us all the reply paid mail box details and we can all send them
a letter. All we need do is quote the reply paid number and spam them with
mail. Thats possibly the best way to hurt them.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Tech Support [mailto:support§saintspc.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 3:27 PM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] .net.au Regsitration Offer


That and the fact of all the reply paid envlopes returned with the doc's
inside saying NO THANKS! Will cut into the Bottom dollar and we can only
hope one of these was stops it from happening soooon!

Regards
David Uzzell

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-return-4213-support=saintspc.com.au§lists.auda.org.au
> [mailto:dns-return-4213-support=saintspc.com.au§lists.auda.org.au] On
> Behalf Of Sean Finn
> Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 3:23 PM
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: RE: [DNS] .net.au Regsitration Offer
>
> Things will dwindle out in time, once their database is stale, and
they
> can't get a freshly hacked one from anywhere.
>
> If they use their exisiting database to guess the next round of
expiries,
> then they may give up after they find their hit rate is too low, and
> there's
> no retrun on their investment.
>
> Given time, and the measures auDA's already taken, this type of spam
will
> stop eventually.
>
> It'll just take some time to starve itself of its resources, thats
all.
>
> -Sean.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Dever [mailto:anthony§billiousness.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 3:03 PM
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: Re: [DNS] .net.au Regsitration Offer
>
>
>
> > DNA represents a generic concept, if they don't exist, others may
take
> > their place.
>
> Hey Lucian,
>
> I fully agree, but I doubt other scammers would continue to make
attempts
> as
> DNA have. It's like the episode of the Simpsons when Lisa compares
Bart's
> intellengence against the intelligence of a mouse. The mouse get
zapped
> once
> by the electified cake and doesn't attempt to eat it again. On the
> otherhand
> Bart keeps touching the cake and gets zapped everytime.  I'm assuming
that
> most scam domain name operatoers would get zapped by auDDA, ACCC and
the
> fedral court once and not go back. Yet DNA keep coming back to get
zapped
> time and time again. In my opinion it seems that the mangement behind
DNA
> are either really devious or really stupid.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of
the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> -
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of
the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)