What about offering the performer band prices on drinks from the bar? -Sean. -----Original Message----- From: Ron Stark [mailto:ronstark§snapsite.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2003 10:41 AM To: dns§lists.auda.org.au Subject: RE: [DNS] Registrant Agreements Your agent / performer analogy simply doesn't hold, because the venue does not then approach the performer and offer additional services that the agent would otherwise perform. In other words, the venue never goes into competition with the agent, as can be (and usually is) the case with registrars / resellers. Ron Stark -----Original Message----- From: Auer, Karl James [mailto:karl.auer§id.ethz.ch] Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 11:59 PM To: dns§lists.auda.org.au Subject: RE: [DNS] Registrant Agreements > Having a reseller agreement with a registrar does not bind > the registrant to a contract with a third party (the registrar). Here's an example - a performer has an agent. The agent looks for a venue that wants the performer to perform. The venue then hires the performer, not the agent. The contract is between the venue and the performer, but the agent manages the relationship and is in many cases authorised to sign on behalf of the performer - i.e., a contract exists between the performer and the agent which then in a certain limited context permits the agent to bind the performer to other contracts. The relationship between the agent and the performer benefits both, as does the relationship between the performer and the venue. In the case of registrars, the situation is even simpler, because of the straightforward nature of the contract, the standardisation of all contracts, and the low risk posed by entering the contract. I can see no reason whatsoever to not allow resellers to act as agents for registrants *provided* the registrant is kept informed. > I'm basing this on the already stated legal opinion in this > forum that a contract between the reseller and the registrant > is not acceptable as authority to act on behalf of the registrant. That would have to depend on the contract. I don't recall seeing the "legal opinion", but as you've stated it, it sounds like a not very good one... Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ Karl Auer (karl.auer§id.ethz.ch) Geschaeft/work +41-1-6327531 Kommunikation, ETHZ RZ Privat/home +41-43-2660706 Clausiusstrasse 59 CH-8092 ZUERICH Switzerland Fax +41-1-6321225 Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule, Zuerich ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (368 subscribers.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (368 subscribers.)Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC