... and you get the client.  If the sole issue is "getting stuff cheaper",
would you be prepared to pay me a commission or royalty for every bit of
hosting and website building that _my_ customer buys from you?

Now THAT's traditional business ;)

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Domain Registration Services
>[mailto:mail§domainregistration.com.au]
>Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 2:47 PM
>To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
>Subject: RE: [DNS] Enetica
>
>
>
>Sounds a little too logical for these people Sean.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sean Finn [mailto:sean§teknol.com.au]
>Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 2:40 PM
>To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
>Subject: RE: [DNS] Enetica
>
>
>
>Scenario:
>"
>A Registrar is in the business of selling domain names.
>
>U want to resell? Cool. I'll give you a discount. You're now
>my reseller,
>and you get stuff cheaper.
>"
>
>Sounds like traditional business to me, if I were focused on
>selling domain
>names, its the model I would adopt.
>
>I sure as heck would not market to my resellers clients, but I
>can still
>compete in the same space for mine.
>
>-Sean.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard Keeves [mailto:richard§ibc.com.au]
>Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 2:35 PM
>To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
>Subject: Re: [DNS] Enetica
>
>
>
>To my knowledge, Enetica have *not* approached our clients
>directly.  Other
>registrars *have* approached our clients.   We have always
>found Enetica
>great to deal with.  What concerns me is that Enetica (and
>others) think it
>ok to compete with their channel -  and target the same
>registrant client
>who was introduced to them by the reseller.   that is a
>business practice
>that is *not*  ok.
>
>
>cheers
>richard
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Domain Registration Services" <mail&#167;domainregistration.com.au>
>To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:32 AM
>Subject: RE: [DNS] Enetica
>
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Have Enetica or any other Registrar approached your clients
>with regards
>to
>> taking them on as direct customers? Or has any Registrar
>approached your
>> clients offering them additional services?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard Keeves [mailto:richard&#167;ibc.com.au]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:48 PM
>> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
>> Subject: Re: [DNS] Enetica
>>
>>
>>
>> I am **NOT**  saying that resellers should be shielded from
>competition.
>for
>> you to say this seriously misses the point of the
>discussion.  But the
>> competition should not come from the registrar whose
>services the reseller
>> is reselling.  Enetica should not be competitng head-on with
>Enetica's own
>> resellers - especially to a registrant who was introduced to
>the registrar
>> by that very reseller.  if that is what is what auDA is
>encouraging thru
>its
>> policies then it not only sux, but it is evil. and in need of change.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------
>-
>> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
>http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
>permission of the
>> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
>http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>Please do not retransmit
>articles on this list without permission of the
>author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
>http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>Please do not retransmit
>articles on this list without permission of the
>author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
>http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>Please do not retransmit
>articles on this list without permission of the
>author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
>