Chris,

I'm sure you'll tell me if I am wrong, but I thought that the laws of
defamation do not apply to companies (in other words you cannot defame a
company).

Also, the line you used "I realise that you are inexperienced in
business and commerce"...is that defaming Daniel?

Dave Hooper


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo§auda.org.au] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 April 2003 11:18 AM
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: RE: [DNS] Melbourne IT Misleading mail out
> 
> 
> Daniel,
> 
> I realise that you are inexperienced in business and commerce 
> and so, may I suggest that in future, should you wish to post 
> comments such as those below, you run them past your lawyers 
> first. As I am sure they will explain to you, your use of the 
> term Without Prejudice is self serving and provides you with 
> no protection whatsoever. Hopefully, your lawyers will also 
> be able to provide you with some guidance on the laws of defamation.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Chris Disspain
> CEO - auDA
> ceo§auda.org.au
> www.auda.org.au
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jumeau [mailto:Bluecom§comdom.net] 
> Sent: Monday, 31 March 2003 16:56
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: RE: [DNS] Melbourne IT Misleading mail out
> 
> Without Prejudice, I think that's why we need a royal 
> commission looking over auDA, some thing is happening under 
> the table, I reckon.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Keys [mailto:rod§ddns.com.au] 
> Sent: Monday, 31 March 2003 2:46 PM
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: RE: [DNS] Melbourne IT Misleading mail out
> 
> In MIT's defence they have agreed to mail all registrants 
> (1500) with a corrective letter. They have also run a 
> corrective message on their web sites front page. What's the 
> point of independant investigation that's why we have auda to 
> oversee the .au namespace.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Jumeau [mailto:Bluecom§comdom.net]
> Sent: Monday, 31 March 2003 4:39 PM
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: [DNS] Melbourne IT Misleading mail out
> 
> 
> Without Prejudice. That's real funny the Melbourne IT mail 
> out. If it was any other registrar I'm sure there 
> accreditation would have been taken off them. Also why is 
> there no consumer alert on Melbourne IT they have done a mail 
> out which is breaching the .au Domain Name Suppliers' Code of 
> Practice. Uregister.com.au did a mail out which breached the 
> .au Domain Name Suppliers' Code of Practice. It got listed on 
> auDA consumer alerts even though at the time were not bound 
> by the .au Domain Name Suppliers' Code of Practice. I think 
> an independent investigation needs to be conducted.
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ---
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => 
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not > retransmit 
> articles on this list without permission of the
> 
> author, further information at the above URL.  (370 subscribers.)
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ---
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => 
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not > retransmit 
> articles on this list without permission of the
> 
> author, further information at the above URL.  (370 subscribers.)
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => 
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not > retransmit 
> articles on this list without permission of the 
> author, further information at the above URL.  (370 subscribers.)
>