Merry Christmas Jason & friends at IRA,

I look forward to receiving a pile of apologies from IRA real soon!

However I still disagree with IRA's spam (regardless of the message
content) as the cost is borne by the end user.

Cheers


Josh
--
http://josh.id.au/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason N <jason&#167;di.com.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2002 12:35 
> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: Re: [DNS] IRA apology following ACCC action
> 
> 
> <snip>In my opinion, IRA should have sent this apology (see 
> below) to the snail mail addresses as this is where the 
> original deceptive mail out was directed. <snip>
> 
> Are you a bit on the thick side mate? They have sent letters 
> by mail as a follow up to the email. Get your facts straight 
> before making moronic comments.
> 
> Jason
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Rowe" <josh&#167;email.nu>
> To: "Dns List" <dns&#167;auda.org.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:01 PM
> Subject: [DNS] IRA apology following ACCC action
> 
> 
> > <snip>In my opinion, IRA should have sent this apology (see  below) 
> > to the snail mail addresses as this is where the original deceptive 
> > mail out was directed. <snip> The cost of sending thousands of 
> > emails is also borne by the user not IRA 
> > (http://www.caube.org.au/problem.htm#Money), a postal correction 
> > would have been paid for by IRA.