> > >If the 2 of them get elected ALL 3 would be AVCC representatives. > > Not a bad showing for an organisation with minimal if any interest > in the management of auDA. > > Oh well, perhaps having parties with no interests would be better > than the alternative. > That is not quite true. The AVCC is actively pursuing the introduction of three new 2LDs. university.au, uni.au, and research.au. So it definitely has an "interest in the management of auDA". The candidates of course have been nominated by the AVCC, and thus may not "represent" the AVCC. From: http://www.auda.org.au/policy/panel-newname-2002/ See: http://www.auda.org.au/policy/submissions/avcc-uni.pdf http://www.auda.org.au/policy/submissions/avcc-research.pdf http://www.auda.org.au/policy/submissions/avcc.pdf Regards, BruceReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC