David, I have every respect for your sentiment. However, from a corporate governance perspective is it appropriate for you, as an auDA Director, to express such views that indicate bias and thereby compromise your objectivity? Ron Stark -----Original Message----- From: David Keegel [mailto:djk§cyber.com.au] Sent: Thursday, 24 October 2002 10:35 AM To: dns§lists.auda.org.au Subject: Re: [DNS] Melbourne IT Your "Trusted" Australian Registrar ] Melbourne IT Your "Trusted" Australian Registrar ] http://web.archive.org/web/20010126091100/www.inww.com/partners/page2.ph ] p3 ] ] "We recognise that your customers are your most valuable asset and we do ] not correspond with them in any direct way." Perhaps there were some words written in invisible ink: ... as long as you have a reseller agreement with Melbourne IT This is why I was asking about the costs of maintaining a reseller agreement with Melbourne IT but not using it for your clients. IIRC the cost of having an inactive reseller agreement is low. Have any former resellers told us yet what Melbourne IT told then when asked to explain itself (after escalating as far as possible within Melb IT's complaints process or until there is a sensible answer)? __________________________________________________________________________ David Keegel <djk§cyber.com.au> URL: http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/ Cybersource P/L: Linux/Unix Systems Administration Consulting/Contracting --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (364 subscribers.)Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC