-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, Dassa <dassa§dhs.org> wrote: > A lease on premises is not always transferred to new owners > of a business. It is up to the owner of the property and > the original lease agreements as to if this is possible. A > new lease is often negotiated. If the existing lease allows > for a transfer then it may take place but the original lease > agreement has to be abided by. An agreement is usually between > two or more entities, you can't just replace one of them with > another unless the agreement also includes provisions for such > a transfer. If the business being sold is incorporated, agreements and licenses need not be affected --- a company has a separate legal existence from its owners. If Example Pty Ltd were sold, there would be no change of registrant in the domain name licence for example.com.au --- the registrant would remain unaltered as Example Pty Ltd. I've search the following and I didn't find anything about the owners (or directors) of a company changing: http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-07.txt http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-18.txt http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-24.txt https://www.enetica.com.au/tc.html Yours sincerely, - -- Mark John Suter | I know that you believe you understand suter§humbug.org.au | what you think I said, but I am not sure gpg key id 2C71D63D | you realise that what you heard is not mobile 0411 262 316 | what I meant. Robert J. McCloskey -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Check Keyservers or http://zwitterion.org/keys/ iD8DBQE9jCP0RYso2ixx1j0RAsoWAJ4pMtb8LerEmjxz2mzVemSYo6kuBgCeLyNL ahqEqxVTSRgXv0+PqUYlWe0= =1KuU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC