Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

From: bw <bw§efe.com.au>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:30:46 +1000
but why have it at all then???

Are the auDA and Lawyers the only ones allowed to make money now?

remove it


Bernard Weekes


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dassa" <dassa&#167;dhs.org>
To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au


> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: bw [mailto:bw&#167;efe.com.au]
> |> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:06 AM
> |> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> |> Subject: Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au
> |>
> |>
> |> No, I dont think the law (oops rule) should be in place,
> |> if wording is a way to avoid it, they will...
> |>
> |> if the auDA step over the line they may wear egg,
> |>
> |> why have such a rule in the first place?
> |> who are they to decide if your selling a private business?
> |>
> |> Bernard Weekes
>
> Anyone can sell a business but if the sale includes items that are
> covered by external license agreements such as applied to domain names
> or software, it may make the sale null and void, something no business
> would wish for.  You can't sell something you don't own, license
> agreements as they are written now don't allow you to onsell the
> products, that goes for most software and definitely domain names.
> Before anyone tries such a venture they consult a good lawyer.
>
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (361 subscribers.)
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC