On Wed, Sep 11, 2002, Richard Archer wrote: > At 14:17 +0800 11/9/02, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > >I keep asking this question, and noone seems to answer it. > >I'm all ears for a solution (or, preferred, a set of solutions) > >but besides using the existing channels (Fair Trade, ACCC) I'm > >quite stumped. > > Well I'm not a lawyer, but how about some of these: > > * Actually *use* the trade practices act against these bastards. Bring > charges against "NetRegister" and the directors for whatever laws > they've broken. Lawyers, what laws have they broken? Or is it something a little blurry like "deceptive business practices" ? > * Facilitate a class action lawsuit by victims of the ING scam against > the remains of the company and the directors > > * Facilitate a class action lawsuit by victims of the recent > "NetRegister" mailout against the company > > * Who owns copyright on the database these mongrels are using for their > scams? Facilitate prosecution for breach of copyright. > > * Seek an injunction preventing further abuse of the database. > > And I'm sure lawyers could think up some other nice ways of making > these scumbags think twice before they try ripping .com.au domain > holders off again. .. but is there a point in testing a case that they may lose? You don't want to set stupid precedents in court involving the domain space.. IANAL, but its tempting.. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "<WeBGrrL> i WAS a lesbian.....but now i love everyone :P" <adrian§creative.net.au>Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC