Which is surely a fairly normal occurrence in any competitive market?

As long as there are effective procedures in place to deal with a registrar
going out of business (I presume it wouldn't be a difficult task with a
thick registry in place) then that shouldn't necessarily be a bad thing.


>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
>From: "Dave Hooper" <dave&#167;davehooper.net>
>To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
>Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 02:16:08 +1000
>Subject: RE: [DNS] Bottle Domains latest auDA Accredited Registrar
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kim Davies [mailto:kim&#167;cynosure.com.au] 
>> Sent: Saturday, 10 August 2002 1:44 AM
>> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
>> Subject: Re: [DNS] Bottle Domains latest auDA Accredited Registrar
>> I would have thought running a registrar could be a very lean 
>> and inexpensive operation that would not take much to be profitable.
>> 
>> kim
>
>Until you add in support costs, which if you hope to be halfway
>succesful you'd need to provide. Then I reckon your profit (which
>amounts to a few measly $ per domain) would quicly march itself out the
>door. As I say, I am no expert, but I'd reckon we may see a few of these
>new entrants run out of puff before the end of year 1.
>
>My 2 cents (inc GST)
>
>Dave Hooper.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
>
>author, further information at the above URL.  (358 subscribers.)
>