On Tue, Jul 30, 2002, Phil Wright wrote:
> "This demonstrates that auDA is serious about enforcing ethical behaviour in
> the domain name industry, and is prepared to act swiftly to protect
> registrants," said auDA CEO, Chris Disspain.
> 
> Why not the same sense of urgency or swiftness when it comes to the 'new'
> auDRP ?
> Why should domain licences that were issued prior to 1 August 2002 be
> offered grace and perceived protection until renewal??

Jesus, do you want the world while you're at it?

> Seems like auDA is attempting to enforce the new auDRP with a clear bias
> that seemingly attempts to protect current domain holders despite there
> being considerable time since a Dispute Resolution Process was available to
> parties with competing or superseding rights?

.. but they'll eventually fall under the auDRP which, hopefully,
should have had a few cases by then providing some precedents.

> Is everyone happy with the auDRP being geared with such bias?
> 
> Surely it is improper to suggest that antecedent and other rights should be
> forced to wait and only exercised when or after a renewal become due?

Personally, I'm happy that this has happened at all.




Adrian


-- 
Adrian Chadd			"But a slightly more realistic way to define
<adrian&#167;creative.net.au>	  intelligence would be the ability to transmit
				    suicidial tendancies." -- Mr Negative Man