>If you are merely going to carry on grandstanding and
>talking about how great you think you are, then please
>just leave. If on the other hand you want to be
>constructive then please get on with it.

Nope, no grand standing.  I have better things to do.  Pre-production of a 
feature film is no mean feat.  Far more difficult than setting up auDA.

However, I am a member of the public and I wish to understand the auDA 
process.  To date, logic seems to escape the process of auDA in it's 
urgency to push for a financial self interested benefit.

After being told by Mark Huges that Directors of auDA can't remove another 
director, I posted the relevant legislation.  I'm then told that only the 
members can remove a Director.  Ok sure.

My question to auDA is:  Are the Directors of auDA, also members of auDA?

Nothing complex in that, or am I getting to damn near the truth again?