for many organisations won't that be one and the same? P -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Fleming [mailto:kevin§w617.com] Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 7:39 PM To: dns§lists.auda.org.au Subject: RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA under the new rules (with ausregistry) - the creation date will not be visible, just the last modification date .. K > -----Original Message----- > From: C.L Ginge [mailto:cyrille.lefevre§scifi-art.com] > Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2002 12:12 PM > To: dns§lists.auda.org.au > Subject: RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA > > > Mr Hughes, > > >I've been recommending for yonks that the creation date not be visible. > >From my email to this list of 3 March 2002: > > Well apparently you don't have much influence because the creation date is > still displayed. > > >I guess I should have refrained from using 5 syllable words if I expected > >everyone to be able to keep up. > > Sorry mate, lots of us didn't go to Harvard, be nice with the > little people. > > > Ginge > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Hughes [mailto:effectivebusiness§pplications.com.au] > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:44 AM > To: dns§lists.auda.org.au > Subject: RE: [DNS] Interesting IRA > > > > Doing a whois on a .com.au domain name ( using aunic.net for example ) > > displays the creation date. > > since .com.au domain names are registered for 2 years, it is > easy to add 2 > > years to find the expiry date... > > I covered this in my email.....when I said > > > "extrapolated based on the > > original domain name registration date" > > I guess I should have refrained from using 5 syllable words if I expected > everyone to be able to keep up. > > > > > > Which means that removing the expiry date is really > > not sufficient to > > prevent misuse of the data. > > I've been recommending for yonks that the creation date not be visible. > From my email to this list of 3 March 2002: > > > A relatively effective solution appears to be to change the > AUNIC site so > that two of the database fields: > > > > * the domain name creation date > > * the first Organisation-Postal field, which has the street address > > > > are not visible to manual or automated enquiries. > > auDA has of course nicely resolved this issue in its whois policy - > http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-whois-final.pdf > > > > > > Correct me if I am wrong. > > Oh, I think you're absolutely right. > > Maybe 'off the pace' a bit :) > > But right, on this one. > > > > > Regards, Mark > > Mark Hughes > Effective Business Applications Pty Ltd > effectivebusiness§pplications.com.au > www.pplications.com.au > +61 4 1374 3959 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (323 subscribers.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (323 subscribers.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (324 subscribers.)Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC