RE: [DNS] RE: auDA to consider new names for .au

RE: [DNS] RE: auDA to consider new names for .au

From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian§regasia.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:14:27 +1000
Actually - that's not right also.

ICANN approximately receives $1US for every domain registered from the
respective registries - Verisign, Neulevel and Afilias (and soon The
Global Name Registry).



Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director
RegistrarsAsia Pty. Ltd.
Level 6, 10 Queens Rd. Melbourne
Victoria. Australia 3004
P: +61 3 9866 1990
F: +61 3 9866 1970
E: adrian&#167;regasia.com 
W: www.regasia.com

 

-----Original Message-----
From: DPF [mailto:david&#167;farrar.com] 
Sent: Saturday, 27 April 2002 2:08 PM
To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] RE: auDA to consider new names for .au

On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:52:56 +1000, "Dassa" <dassa&#167;dhs.org> wrote:
>|> -----Original Message-----
>|> From: Jon Lawrence [mailto:jon&#167;jonlawrence.com] 
>|> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 12:25 AM
>|> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
>|> Subject: RE: [DNS] RE: auDA to consider new names for .au
>|> 
>|> 
>|> >You were equating the need for charging (higher) fees with the
>provison
>|> >of a professional service, as evidence in the past and present,
this
>|> >does not hold true and the level of fees charged has no bearing on
>the
>|> >service provided in most cases.
>|> 
>|> No I wasn't.  I simply said that I think the DNS should berun
>professionally.
>|> You assume that I think fees should rise, which I don't.  
>|> For instance I think the US$6 per name per year that Verisign
>Registry 
>|> charge for .coms is way too high, especially as they have almost 30
>million 
>|> names under management.
><snip>
>
>One thing we should bear in mind is the difference between AuDA and
>Registries/Registrars operating within the .au namespace.  AuDA is
>primarily concerned with the overall management of the namespace and
the
>fees they charge are to be used for different purposes to those charged
>by Registries/Registrars operating within the namespace.
>
>The $6USD fee you quote above is set by ICANN and is delivered into
>their control, much like the $11AuD quoted to go towards AuDA.  When
you
>purchase a second level domain under .com $6USD goes to ICANN and the
>rest of the registration fee goes to the Registry/Registrar.  

This isn't quite right.  The US6/year fee for .com etc all goes to the
registry.  ICANN does not get that money or even a specific proportion
per domain name.  They do get around $1,000,000 a year or so from
Verisign but this is equivalent to less than 10 cents per name.

DPF
--
david&#167;farrar.com
ICQ 29964527

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the

author, further information at the above URL.  (309 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC