Excuse me people I would naturally believe (and I expect that others in the industry and the wider general public would also naturally conclude) that surely such responsibility for a public awareness and consumer warnings about domain registration in the .au space would, could and should already fall under the duties of the industry peak body; hence the auDA?? Is this NOT the case?? If it is not the auDA then whom should it be? Why? Phil Wright Network.com.au Pty Ltd >Jon, > >With everything that is happening, movement to registry, code of conduct, >registrar accreditation and more, we would be more than willing to review >such a site and depending on content and the way in which the information >was presented refer our clients to this site for up to date information >regarding the FACTS about .au domains. > >I believe such a site will need to be reviewed by the auDA and be given a >go ahead to represent the hole community. > >Michael-Pappas >www.clickngo.com.au > > Hi Jon, > > I agree with you here. We all should stop bitching about specific > registries but I mean, what's been done about it? > > Maybe we could start a consumer awareness web site for .com.au > registrants to refer to when the are confused about what's going on in > the .au domain registration industry. > > I am willing to put a site together to inform consumers from ISPs, web > hosts and domain registries on what's going on without any ads etc on > it. A site that all the companies who abide by the 'Code of Conduct' > including a blacklist of domain registries that can send their > customers to get the most up-to-date information from. Even have a > partition of registries that have a good track record. > > Would anyone be interested sending their confused customers to such a > site? > > Regards, > NigelReceived on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC