Mark I agree with your analysis. At the end of the day, we need to understand that auDA as a self-regulatory body only has a contractual right to enforce behaviors which will breach a contract - that means that only parties who have entered into contracts with auDA will be bound. Actions which are misleading etc. by parties who are not bound by auDA documents, are matters which are properly regulated by Government bodies such as ACCC. Rather than making complaints on this forum, why not make a formal complaint to the ACCC, with information that you have. Craig Craig Ng Partner Maddocks t +613 9288 0523 f +613 9288 0666 e craig.ng§maddocks.com.au >>> "effectivebusiness§pplications.com.au" 03/15/02 16:13 PM >>> There are two significant issues from the published stuff from auDA's Code of Practice committee. Firstly, the timeframe. The committee notes that auDA's estimated "go live" date May 2002 for the new system. Well, anyone that's worked with these sort of projects knows some slippage may occur - but even so, its not that far away. Therefore squabbling over existing practices of Registrar / Resellers is pretty pointless - with everyone working to get a replacement system live I think its unrealistic to expect anyone to expend limited resources trying to take some sort of action (possibly unsuccessful) against an entity misusing a system that is going to end in a couple of months. Such action might not even be resolved before the new system is implemented. Let's focus on getting the new system right, folks. Secondly, the sanctions. The sanctions to breaches of the code of practice will apply to Registrars and any 'accredited re-sellers' those Registrars may have. but they won't apply to anyone who registers domain names who isn't a Registrar's accredited re-seller. Any entity that wishes follow domain name renewal / transfer practices that some may view as 'unsavoury' (no names, no pack drill) doesn't have to be an 'accredited re-seller of a Registrar. They can just be an ordinary customer of the Registrar. So the Code of Practice will have no effect on any entity that chooses to continue to register domain names, but doesn't want to be either a Registrar or an 'accredited re-seller'. There's nothing new about this - its exactly analogous to the renewal, for example, of business names. I could go out and spam thousands of companies offering to renew their business names for them for a high fee. No enforceable code of practice would apply. That's why I believe we need a two pronged strategy to successfully improve the ethics of the domain name renewal biz: * The code of practice - which will have some beneficial effect * A change to the domain name information visible to the public (e.g. creation date and street address should not be visible) - which will have some beneficial effect. I think this change should be implemented now if only requires minimal technical effort. Regards, Mark PS - the auDA web site also has an 'interim code of practice' as a .pdf, but it doesn't address sanctions, and is sketchy. Mark Hughes Effective Business Applications Pty Ltd effectivebusiness§pplications.com.au www.pplications.com.au --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the author, further information at the above URL. (327 subscribers.) ------------------------------------------------------- Craig Ng Maddocks Tel: (03) 92880555 International: +61 3 92880555 Fax: (03) 92880666 International: +61 3 92880666 Web: http://www.maddocks.com.au ------------------------------------------------------- The information in this electronic mail is privileged and confidential, intended only for use of the individual or entity named. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, copying or use of the information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error please delete it immediately from your system and inform us by email on info§maddocks.com.au. -------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC