*lol* - thanks for the welcome, Vlady.... Yeah I'm still kinda a beginner with some of the aspects of DNS and NS admin, but I'm working on it - hopefully ya'll guyz can help me out .. :-) - SnooP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vladimir Nikolaevich Dezhurov" <vnd§email.com> To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:30 AM Subject: Re: [DNS] DNS problems > Hi SnooP > > I am Vladimir but my friends call me Vlady. > I have followed with great interest that discussion about DNS problems, god knows i am still a beginner, but it feels really good to be able to mix with people that have so much experience in IT. > I am learning, I am learning.. :) > > > Vlady. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Snoop" <cybsnoop§tpg.com.au> > Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 00:26:15 +1100 > To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> > Subject: Re: [DNS] DNS problems > > > > And what if it DOESN'T pass the test? > > > > Oh, BTW - hi all :-) > > > > - SnooP > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nick Andrew" <lists-dns§nick-andrew.net> > > To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> > > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:17 AM > > Subject: Re: [DNS] DNS problems > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:32:52AM +0100, Bruce Campbell wrote: > > > > urm, how, exactly, are you proposing to have this implemented? (or, do > > > > you really understand the mechanics behind DNS secondaries? ) > > > > > > I already passed enough detail to David Keegel and Bruce to enable such > > > a thing to be implemented if it is desired. For everybody else though, > > > I'll outline the rough details below. > > > > > > > Your proposal, noble as it is, indicates that named-xfer must be > > replaced > > > > by something which applies business rules on a given zone and possibly > > on > > > > a per source basis as well. > > > > > > That's exactly right. The basic idea is to replace named-xfer as called > > > from named with a script which uses the original named-xfer to first > > > transfer the requested zone from the hidden master. Once the candidate > > > zone file has been received, the script can then test it in any > > > desired manner, and if it passes the tests, the script returns a > > > successful exit code to its parent (named). > > > > > > Consequently, there is no change required to the sender of the domain > > > info, no change to the BIND code itself, just a script running in > > > the middle of BIND normal functionality. > > > > > > > Who is going to implement this? > > > > > > I'd hope whoever maintains box2.aunic.net will think it's a nifty > > > idea which might save some heartache in future. > > > > > > Nick. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - > > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => > > http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the > > > author, further information at the above URL. (329 subscribers.) > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the > > author, further information at the above URL. (329 subscribers.) > > > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Email.com > http://www.email.com/?sr=signup > > Travelocity.com is giving away two million travel miles. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3969773;6991039;g?http://svc.travelocity.com/p romos/millionmiles_main/0,,TRAVELOCITY,00.html > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the > author, further information at the above URL. (329 subscribers.) >Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC