|> -----Original Message----- |> From: Mark Hughes [mailto:effectivebusiness§pplications.com.au] |> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:48 PM |> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au |> Subject: RE: [DNS] Au Domain up for Auction? |> <snip> |> Since the com.au policy is being altered to specifially allow trademarks and |> 'substantial connection to the name' as grounds for a com.au domain name, |> then we're going to have the situation where businesses have brands / |> trademarks with matching com.au domain names. |> |> Its a common practice to build up the value of a brand name or trademark, |> and then sell it to another entity - it happens all the time. The domain |> name is going to have to go with it, or it makes a nonsense of allowing |> trademarks or a 'brand' as a ground for obtaining a com.au name. I would agree that selling a domain name as part of a business would be a necessity. The difference here is where a domain name is being sold without any value adding to it. It is being sold purely as the domain name without any effort having been put into building up any branding or good will in it. What is normally used as part of the criteria for a bad faith registration under an ICANN UDRP action. Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC