Are you Taliban Ron? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Stark" <ronstark§businesspark.com.au> To: <dns§lists.auda.org.au> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: [DNS] Solution to domains renewal furore > At the risk of provoking a violent reaction ("Over my dead body!" was one > such and "What??" another), I'll float the idea again: > > All of the practices we want to stamp out are centred on domain name > renewals. We can easily stop it all cold - instantly - simply by decreeing > that *only* registrars are permitted to send out renewal notices, and then > only to their own registrants. We could even increase the price (or margin) > for the first registration, and lower the renewal price. > > As a reseller, I am well aware of the cons, so don't flame me on that. > Pros, however, include: > > 1 Direct mail marketing would only go to those clients who do not > already have a domain name, therefore there's no risk of "stealing" clients > from another reseller > > 2 It would encourage value-added services at the time of original > registration, and remove many of the confusing "not illegal" offerings > > 3 It would eliminate any tendency for registrars to compete with their > own resellers in the domain name space. > > 4 There is not much margin in renewing, and little opportunity to add > value at renewal time. My suggestion would create more volume in renewals > (in the hands of registrars) thereby making it more efficient. > > 5 Many of the CoP issues that arise due to deceptive solicitations for > renewals would no longer be necessary > > 6 Renewals should eventually be less expensive for consumers, because > there's no need to build in reseller margins. > > 7 We could all concentrate on opening up new markets (new registrants) > instead of fighting over a closed market (existing registrants) > > 8 Problems and conflicts arising from renewal notice timing would > disappear > > 9 Policing, monitoring and conflict resolution would be cleaner and > simpler. > > 10 Renewal notices would only come from the proper registering > authority. There would be objection to renewals that simply "look" official > - they'd all be official for real. > > 11 Developing new business would be less susceptible to abuse. > > 12 The task of educating consumers would be simpler, faster and more > economical. > > As Bruce Tonkin said (I think it was Bruce) the vast majority of resellers > offer domain name services as but a small part of other bundled services, > and those bundles are where business opportunities and profitability lie for > resellers. It's those value-added services that provide scope for > innovation and strong but healthy competition as well. > > I sometimes draw an analogy between a domain name and a car number plate. > One allows your car to be used on roads, the other allows your business to > be used on the Internet. Both have a similar significance to consumers - if > I buy a car, I don't give a damn where the number plate comes from, as long > as I have one as evidence that registration has occurred. At renewal time, > the registration authority sends me a renewal notice - not the car dealer! > > Similarly with registering a business name. If my accountant does it, it's > a reimbursible expense, and it's *me* that's sent a reminder to renew the > name registration - not my accountant. I may, however, elect to ask him to > perform the service on my behalf, and pay him a fee to do so. > > In other words, we already have multiple proven business models and > processes as precedents, from which to draw ideas. They're simple, > consumers already fully understand and accept them, and they're already > comfortable with the concepts and procedures. > > Why are we trying to invent a new, more complicated one? > > > Ron Stark > Business Park Pty Ltd > mail: ronstark§businesspark.com.au > phone: +61 (0)3 9521 0649 fax: +61 (0)3 9521 0485 > mob: +61 (0)41 812 9922 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the > author, further information at the above URL. (314 subscribers.) > >Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC