On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 06:16:44 +1100, Adrian Stephan wrote: > The three criteria are: > > 1. They have a single word company name that pre-dates the internet as we > know it today. > 2. The company name is exactly the same as a word that MelbourneIT has > subsequently defined as a generic word and consequently been denied their > exact company name as a domain name on this basis. > 3. That word (the established primary identity and exact company name of > the business) is now up for public auction as a domain name. Hi Adrian Work backwards. There are 3,000 names on the auction list. Eliminate the very few multiple word names (which shouldn't be there anyway). Then look the rest up on ASIC's National Name Index or other business registers.. With hundreds of thousands of registered corporations and business names in Australia, my guess is that the answer to your question will be "all of them". Certainly there will be at least 2,000. So you are not alone !! But so what? If you are making a statement that you are hard done by, you have made that point very many times on this list already. If you are making the point that other businesses share your misfortune, well . . . we knew that !! Personally I think you are investing far too much energy into a problem for which, if you related it to people at a party, most people there wouldn't be interested. Or they would say "Oh, what bad luck" or "Oh, what a shame" and move on to the next topic of conversation. Most people learn to weather minor misfortunes, and even quite serious ones, with a shrug. How would you feel, for example, about the massive economic downturn in Argentina? Or the huge bad debts which are threatening to bring down Japan and possibly China? Or even the collapse of companies like Enron, the seventh biggest in the world? Or even non-economic issues like the plight of Australian refugees in Woomera? I mean what's the point, anyway? Even if everyone on the list voted in your favour, there is not the remotest chance that "logistics.com.au" will get taken off the auction list. That would be seen as quite improper influence. And even if the protest took to the streets in mass demonstrations, I would think it highly unlikely that auDA would back down, at this late stage, from its auction of generics. Of course, I am speaking personally here !! Why do I think that? Simply because there are now thousands of people who have accepted the proposal by lodging a submission for a generic domain name. That's thousands of unhappy people as opposed to one. Some, at least, would take legal action. If I were you, I would not misread expressions of sympathy as support for your ongoing campaign to change the system. It seems to me that your single-minded obsession has blinded you to the fact that people have good and bad luck every day of the week. At least you company seems to be doing well. So think yourself lucky. I have run out of personal funds supporting mine. And that's quite a lot of money. At least to me !! And I am sure many of us on this list have other misfortunes. Deaths in the family, sickness etc. To be blunt, any business adviser would tell you that there is little you can do. You should: (a) immediately lodge an application for "logistics.com.au", and (b) be quiet on the subject until the auction is over (so as not to alert other companies in the logistics industry), Should you be unsucessful getting the domain name, you should consider changing your corporate name and brand (despite the many years you have had it) to LOGISTIC. This is actually quite a good name as it distinguishes you from your fellows in the logistics industry. However, the word "logistic" is very popular. I have performed a Google search on the word "logistic" at http://www.google.com/search?q=logistic and was surprised at the popularity of the word. I found, on the first 6 pages: trans-logistic.org logistic-net.com logistic-solutions.com logisticrecords.com logistic-systems.com transportlogistic.de acs-logistic.fr logisticsp.com logisticdesign.co.uk totallogistic.com dklogistic.com logisticaction.com rsb-logistic.com logisticdirections.com logistic-data.com rsb-logistic.de logistic-world.com airport-logistic-academy.de worldlogistic.com northstarlogistic.com web-logistic.com abc-logistic.com onyxlogistic.com Unfortunately, I could not find any reference to your own business. I then performed another search using the expression "logistic australia". You seemed not to be on the early pages there either. I have also gone to your home page at "logistic.com.au" and note your keywords include "logistic" and "logistics" but not "australia". In fact most of the keywords were technical terms rather than day-to-day words like "management" or "systems". In fact, your own home page provides a very poor explanation of exactly what your business does. Personally I cannot understand the following comment: "Logistics is the group of disciplines that can take a concept through to the end product, and then have the means to keep the product performing as designed." The website dictionary.com has several definitions of "logistics" as follows: lo�gis�tics (l-jstks, l-) n. (used with a sing. or pl. verb) (1) The aspect of military operations that deals with the procurement, distribution, maintenance, and replacement of materiel and personnel. (2) The management of the details of an operation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- [French logistiques, from logistique, logic (perhaps influenced by loger, to quarter), from Medieval Latin logisticus, of calculation. See logistic.] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Source: The American Heritage� Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright � 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. logistics \Lo*gis"tics\, n 1. (Mil.) That branch of the military art which embraces the details of moving and supplying armies. The meaning of the word is by some writers extended to include strategy. --H. L. Scott. 2. (Math.) A system of arithmetic, in which numbers are expressed in a scale of 60; logistic arithmetic. Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, � 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc. logistics n : handling an operation that involves providing labor and materials be supplied as needed. Source: WordNet � 1.6, � 1997 Princeton University From these sources we can get the following relevant "keywords": procure procurement distribute distribution maintenance replacement materiel materials personnel military army armies moving movement supply strategy strategic operation calculation You could also add: methods techniques systems management Surprisingly, perhaps, your set of keywords does not include very many of these words. In fact, I would suggest that, if you want to get attention via the internet, you should engage a good web designer who could explain exactly what you do and improve your standing in the search engines. Best regards Patrick Corliss _________________________________________________________ I'm on the Board of auDA (the .au country code) as well as TLDA (the Top Level Domain Association). Please note that anything I write is my own personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect the views of any body with which I am associated. Please also note IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer).Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC